Risk Aversion and Wealth: Evidence from Person-to-Person Lending Portfolios
نویسندگان
چکیده
We estimate risk aversion from the actual financial decisions of 2,168 investors in a person-toperson lending platform. We develop a method to estimate a risk aversion parameter from each portfolio choice. Since the same individuals invest repeatedly, we construct a panel dataset that we use to disentangle heterogeneity in attitudes towards risk across investors, from the elasticity of risk aversion to changes in wealth for a given investor. We find that wealthier investors are more risk averse in the cross section, and that investors become more risk averse after a negative housing wealth shock. Thus, investors exhibit preferences consistent with decreasing relative risk aversion and habit formation. JEL codes: E21, G11, D12, D14. ∗We are grateful to Lending Club for providing the data and for helpful discussions on this project. We thank Michael Adler, Manuel Arellano, Nick Barberis, Geert Bekaert, Patrick Bolton, John Campbell, Larry Glosten, Nagpurnanand Prabhala, Bernard Salanie, and seminar participants at CEMFI, Columbia University GSB, Duke Fuqua School of Business, Hebrew University, Harvard Business School, Kellogg School of Management, Kellstadt Graduate School of Business-DePaul, London Business School, Maryland Smith School of Business, M.I.T. Sloan, Universidad Nova de Lisboa, the Yale 2010 Behavioral Science Conference, and the SED 2010 meeting for helpful comments. We thank the Program for Financial Studies for financial support. All remaining errors are our own. Please send correspondence to Daniel Paravisini ([email protected]), Veronica Rappoport ([email protected]), and Enrichetta Ravina ([email protected]).
منابع مشابه
Subjective And Objective Risk Tolerance: Implications For Optimal Portfolios
The distinction between subjective and objective risk tolerance is illustrated by expected utility analyses of portfolios. Optimal portfolios were derived for one, 5, and 20 year investment horizons for 6 major financial asset categories. The important aspects of objective risk tolerance are the proportion of an investor's total wealth (including human wealth) in financial assets, and the inves...
متن کاملRisk and Wealth in a Model of Self-fulfilling Currency Attacks
We analyze the effect of risk aversion, wealth and portfolios on the behavior of investors in a global game model of currency crises with continuous action choices. The model generates a rich set of striking theoretical predictions. For example, risk aversion makes currency crises significantly less likely; increased wealth makes crises more likely; and foreign direct investment (illiquid inves...
متن کاملRisk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem
Within the expected-utility framework, the only explanation for risk aversion is that the utility function for wealth is concave: A person has lower marginal utility for additional wealth when she is wealthy than when she is poor. This paper provides a theorem showing that expected-utility theory is an utterly implausible explanation for appreciable risk aversion over modest stakes: Within expe...
متن کاملBetrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States
Risk aversion plays a central role in economic theory. It helps us understand why individuals insure and save, why investors do not place all their eggs in the basket offering the highest expected payoff, and why entrepreneurs earn a generous premium. But risk aversion alone may not account for people’s willingness to take risk when the chance event is the action of another person rather than n...
متن کاملLife Cycle Consumption and Portfolio Choice with Additive Habit Formation Preferences and Uninsurable Labor Income Risk
Representative agent asset pricing models with habit formation preferences do not generate implications for the behavior of individual agents. To explore these implications , I consider a life cycle model of consumption, savings and portfolio allocation for a household with additive and endogenous habit formation preferences. To solve the model, I characterize analytically the boundary of admis...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Management Science
دوره 63 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017